December 23, 2012

Ending The Global Drug War: Voices From The Front Lines

“Ever since the War on Drugs, everything has hit the fan,” says Romesh Bhattacharji, former Narcotics Commissioner of India. Rather than continue the unnecessary and costly drug war, Bhattacharji advises the United States to simply “Relax, take it easy, [and] tolerate.”

Last month, at the Cato Institute’s “Ending the Global War on Drugs” conference, Bhattacharji’s sentiments were echoed by ex-drug czars, cops, politicians, intellectuals, liberal and conservative journalists, and even the former President of Brazil.

Reason.tv attended the event and spoke with a number of the featured speakers, including:

Glenn Greenwald, Salon.com

Mary Anastasia O’Grady, Wall Street Journal

Tucker Carlson, The Daily Caller

Luis Alberto Lacalle Pou, Speaker of the House of Deputies, Uruguay

Leigh Maddox, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition; University of Maryland School of Law

Enrique Gomez Hurtado, former Senator, Colombia

Larry Campbell, Senator, Canada

Romesh Bhattacharji, former Narcotics Commissioner, India

Eric Sterling, Criminal Justice Policy Foundation

Harry G. Levine, Queens College (N.Y.)

Juan Carlos Hidalgo, Cato Institute

Want Marijuana 100% Legal in 2012?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ONZb-DUWjjI

Excerpt from Ron Paul’s Audio Book “Liberty Defined”

 

Legalization Debate: First Pot, Now Coke?

Colombia’s president suggested it’s an option.

Legalization used to be the rallying cry of stoners alone. Not anymore.

In Latin America, leaders seem to be reaching a new consensus about the drug war: it has failed, and it’s time for a new solution.

Most say that foreign demand for cocaine and marijuana is the underlying problem.

If American, Europeans and others stopped buying the drugs, the vast black-market for the trade wouldn’t exist. The drug traffickers wouldn’t be able to charge huge profits, and they wouldn’t be able to afford the massive weaponry and build the network of informants, enforcers, dealers and mules that allow them to sustain their production and distribution supply chain.

But you can’t exactly presto demand away. Unless, the reasoning goes, you just legalize the drugs. Sell them over the counter for a reasonable price. Undercut the illegal market. Give the farmers who grow the stuff good jobs, free of fear, and give governments a share in the drug profits by taxing them.

It’s by no means a perfect solution.

But the fact that two of the more influential presidents in the region — whose countries have been some of the most affected by the drug violence that has escalated amid the cartels’ growing power — gives the idea new credence.

President Felipe Calderon recently suggested that legalizing marijuana might be worth considering.

During his speech at the United Nations in September, he said:

We are living in the same building. And our neighbor is the largest consumer of drugs in the world. And everybody wants to sell him drugs through our doors and our windows. …If the consumption of drugs cannot be limited, then decision-makers must seek more solutions — including market alternatives — in order to reduce the astronomical earnings of criminal organizations.”

Calderon would hardly seem like a poster-child for legalization. He came into office in 2006 and declared war on the drug cartels. His aggressive crackdown unleashed a spate of violence so extreme that Mexico has become synonymous with the drug war. An estimated 40,000 people have been killed, and that’s likely a conservative estimate. Many deaths have been gruesome, photographed and distributed to warn snitches, or journalists, or bloggers. Whoever the cartels feel like targeting any given day.

But he’s not the first Mexican president to reach that conclusion. Ernesto Zedillo and Vicente Fox, his last two predecessors, also pushed for drug-policy reform. After they left office, which suggests how unpopular that idea was then.

And in Colombia, President Juan Manuel Santos took things a step further recently when he suggested in an interview with UK weekly Observer that it’s time for a fresh approach to the drug war.

He said: “I might consider legalising cocaine if there is a world consensus because this drug has affected us most here in Colombia. …A new approach should try and take away the violent profit that comes with drug trafficking… If that means legalising, and the world thinks that’s the solution, I will welcome it. I’m not against it.”

He’s not exactly a dove, either. His government has fought aggressively against the cartels. Just last week, Colombian forces killed FARC leader Alfonso Cano in a bombing raid, in a massive blow to the guerilla movement that has plagued Colombia for decades.

Still, Santos also was quick to say that he wasn’t about to start a legalization crusade, saying he’d be “crucified” for it.

So he knows what it means when he makes statements like this:

“Yes, I know, and I’m conscious of what this means. I’ve told President Calderón [of Mexico], ‘You and I have a lot more authority to talk about this because our countries have spilled a lot of blood fighting drug traffickers and we should promote this discussion.”

It’s unclear what would or could happen next. The US is firmly opposed to legalizing marijuana, so much so that federal authorities have cracked down on dispensaries and growers, set up ostensibly to supply the drug for medicinal purposes. The White House also clarified its position recently, stating that it does not support legalization, mostly because it isn’t good for you.

Imagine the federal government’s reaction to legalizing cocaine. It’s a non-starter.

Still, the US may not be the most powerful voice on this issue any more. Its influence remains strong in Latin America in part because it invests millions in anti-drug money and training for security forces to combat the cartels.

If these countries lose patience with the battle, as it seems many are doing, or have done, that could change the power dynamic significantly.

Source:

https://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/globalpost-blogs/que-pasa/legalization-debate-first-pot-now-coke

Why is Marijuana Illegal? Examining the Health Aspects of Cannabis

Countless studies have highlighted the industrial and medicinal uses of marijuana (cannabis), yet the federal government claims that it has ‘no accepted medical use’ and continues to classify it in the same category as heroin, MDMA, and PCP.

Despite the ruling, the medical marijuana market is priced at around $1.7 billion — that’s almost as much as the explosive Viagra market, coming in at around $1.9 billion.

Why do so many individuals suffering from disease swear by marijuana if it has no real medical use? And furthermore, were the thousands of studies on the medicinal benefits of marijuana completely incorrect?

Studies have found marijuana use to be beneficial in treating multiple sclerosis, Tourette syndrome, obsessive-compulsive disorder, brachial plexus neuropathies, insomnia, pain, memory disorders, anxiety disorders, cancer, neurodegenerative disease, and many more conditions.

Marijuana Plant, Hemp, and Cannabinoids

Some cannabis activists actually state that certain properties of marijuana can act as a “cure-all” in the right forms. You may know that marijuana is usually quite high in THC (delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol), which is the compound responsible for the psychoactive effect of cannabis. In contrast, it is also low in CBD (cannabidiol) content. Both THC and CBD are known as cannabinoids, however, which interacts with your body in a very unique way.

What you may not be familiar with is how CBD has been shown to block the effect of THC in the nervous system. This allows marijuana plants to exhibit the most psychoactive effects. Hemp, on the other hand, is high in CBD and low in THC. This is due to the fact that it is bred to maximize its fiber, seeds, and oil. Of course these key properties are what it is most commonly used for.

You see, hemp is a very powerful industrial substance, but it also has a number of health benefits.

Interestingly enough, THC-free hemp is actually quite popular in protein drinks, green superfoods, and even clothing. This type of hemp has zero psychoative effects, yet it is still illegal to grow within the United States.

Two tablespoons of shelled hemp seeds contain about 11 grams of protein and 2 grams of unsaturated omega-3 fatty acids.

Cannabinoids are promoted as a health-promoting substance in the popular documentary Run from the Cure with Rick Simpson.

Source: https://www.activistpost.com/2011/11/why-is-marijuana-illegal-examining.html

Clearing the Smoke: The Science of Cannabis - Full Documentary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3ZfgerGdKc

“Clearing the Smoke: The Science of Cannabis” reveals how cannabis acts on the brain and in the body to treat nausea, pain, epilepsy, cancer, and many other illnesses both mental and physical.

“Clearing the Smoke” includes extensive interviews with patients, doctors, researchers and skeptics.

 

Connecticut: Marijuana Decriminalization Measure Is Now Law

Democratic Gov. Dan Malloy signed legislation into law on Thursday, June 30 ‘decriminalizing’ the possession of small, personal use amounts of marijuana by adults. The new law, Senate Bill 1014, took effect on Friday, July 1.

 

Senate Bill 1014 reduces the penalties for the adult possession of up to one-half ounce of marijuana from a criminal misdemeanor (formerly punishable by one year in jail and a $1,000 fine) to a non-criminal infraction, punishable by a $150 fine, no arrest or jail time, and no criminal record. The new law similarly reduces penalties for the possession of marijuana paraphernalia.

Connecticut’s new law is similar to the existing ‘decriminalization’ laws in California,Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Nebraska,New York, and Oregon where private, non-medical possession of marijuana is treated as a civil, non-criminal offense.

 

Five additional states — Minnesota,Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, and Ohio — treat marijuana possession offenses as a fine-only misdemeanor offense. Alaska law imposes no criminal or civil penalty for the private possession of small amounts of marijuana by adults.

 

Lawmakers in California and Kentucky previously enacted laws this year reducing penalties for marijuana possession.

 

 

Source: https://www.activistpost.com/2011/07/connecticut-marijuana-decriminalization.html

Fans of Space Aliens and Marijuana Undo Well-Meaning White House Program

It has been a little over a month since the White House launched an outreach program promising official responses to policy ideas submitted by everyday Americans.

The result? A whole lot of arguing concerning space aliens, marijuana legalization, and onetime murder suspect Casey Anthony, followed by a bunch of vague, bureaucratic answers from bedraggled staff members.

In short: it has been an entertaining project to watch! The gist of the program was announced in September, when the White House asked people to submit questions or “calls for action … on a range of issues.” The threshold for answering a demand was setup like this: “if a petition gathers enough support (i.e., signatures) it will be reviewed by a standing group of White House staff, routed to any other appropriate offices and generate an official, on-the-record response.”

It was a pretty cool idea and it got off to a great start. The White House team first considered a petition that gathered some 32,000 signatures asking for the government to forgive all student loan debt. While not bowing to the petitioners’ demands wholesale, the Obama team responded Oct. 26 with the announcement of a new policy to reduce student loan debt on students.

We agree that reducing the burden of student loans is an effective way to stimulate the economy and save taxpayer dollars. That’s why we’re excited to announce a new policy that speaks to the concerns expressed in this petition.

Only a sucker would assume the White House drafted its student debt “Pay as You Earn” proposal in response to a petition signed by 32,000 people on the Internet. But still, it created a nice call-and-response dialogue with the participants and gave a sense that the administration was taking the petitions seriously.

But then… things didn’t go so well. The White House became overwhelmed with submissions. It raised the previous threshold of 5,000 signatures necessary for a response to 25,000. And then it started issuing blanket responses and no promises of any policy changes.

Marijuana fans collected enough signatures to get a response from the White House… but the answer wasn’t all that satisfying, just a statement explaining that “marijuana use is a significant source for voluntary drug treatment admissions and visits to emergency rooms.” The response also acknowledged that we can’t “arrest our way out of the problem” and noted the administration’s commitment to drug rehabilitation.

Then came the space-alien people, who got a petition through the process asking the White House to “immediately disclose the government’s knowledge of and communications with extraterrestrial beings.” The White House replied: “Searching for ET, But No Evidence Yet,” and ticked off a series of NASA projects related to the discovery of intelligent life beyond the skies. Other issues that crossed the threshold garnered “no comment” responses, such as a request to “Try Casey Anthony in Federal Court for Lying to the FBI Investigators” and a request to investigate judicial misconduct the case of former Agriprocessors executive Sholom Rubashkin.

For many reasons the White House didn’t offer more fully-fleshed responses. Many of the more popular petitions require acts of Congress and constitutional amendments outside of the control of the president. Others involved hot-button issues that an administration heading into campaign season would be crazy to take on.

But the angry petitioners, whose passions had been stoked by the well-meaning initiative, started airing their grievances against the White House once it dawned on them that the whole thing wasn’t much more than a public-relations ploy. “Actually take these petitions seriously instead of just using them as an excuse to pretend you are listening,” reads a petition that has generated almost 15,000 signatures. Another one dripping with sarcasm reads: “We demand a vapid, condescending, meaningless, politically safe response to this petition,” which generated 9,000 signatures.

Nobody was happy. The marijuana people offered this reaction. The space-alien geeks said the whole thing was ”unacceptable.” In The Washington Post, Esther Cepeda wrote that the program was all sleight-of-hand. “By bringing the absurdity of reality-TV voting gimmicks into government policy decisions, but not really following through in the way people hoped, Obama has succeeded in further turning off supporters who believed he’d be a good listener — and vindicated cynics who never believe politicians will keep their word.”

Ouch!

This We the People experiment has proven a little tricky. Is the White House ready to give up? Not yet.

Last week, the administration acknowledged the backlash but reasserted its commitment. “There has been some frustration with the answers from those who disagree with Administration policy, and that’s fair,” White House digital strategy director Macon Phillips wrote in a blog post.“…If these petitions are fostering a debate that might not otherwise take place about the issues Americans care about, that’s a positive thing.”

Source: https://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/11/fans-of-space-aliens-and-marijuana-undo-White-House-program/44697/

Peter Reynolds - Cannabis Law Reform - TruthJuice Bristol

A presentation by Peter Reynolds, leader of Cannabis Law Reform (CLEAR), an officially registered UK political party, working for a change in the law, particularly for those who need cannabis as medicine. Recorded on the 12th October 2011 at TruthJuice Bristol

To subscribe to the Truth Juice Bristol youtube channel follow this link:

https://www.youtube.com/user/TruthJuiceBristol

 

For more information on weekly TruthJuice Bristol talks see these links:

https://bristol.truthjuice.co.uk/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/173598132725670

https://www.facebook.com/TruthJuiceBristol

https://twitter.com/#!/BristolTruth

 

For information on TruthJuice talks follow this link:

https://www.truthjuice.co.uk/

 

For more information on CLEAR - Cannabis Law Reform, see these links:

https://clear-uk.org/

https://www.facebook.com/ClearUK

 

Extra links:

https://clear-uk.org/cannabis-information/

https://peterreynolds.wordpress.com/