November 5, 2012

You are here: Home / Archives for Crime / Murder

Bombshell: Senator Suggested False Flag Attack To Kennedy 2 Years Prior To Operation Northwoods Proposal

August 31, 2012 By 1 Comment

Originally posted by Mr.H on share.banoosh.com

According to newly released documents by the John F. Kennedy Memorial Library, former Californian democratic senator George Smathers proposed an Operation Northwoods style false flag attack on Gitmo to then Massachusetts senator Kennedy. The Guardian reports Kennedy and Smathers were seriously entertaining the possibility of assassinating Fidel Castro. Kennedy was obviously against the entire idea. Smathers went on to propose the option of bombing American troops to provide an excuse for military intervention in Cuba. Significant about Smather’s confessions is the now apparent fact that the idea of bombing the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay was obviously floating in political circles as well as military ones some time before the actual formalization of the false flag proposals in the Operation Northwoods documents, ultimately rejected by President Kennedy in 1962. The other significant aspect of the confession by Smathers is that the proposals described within Northwoods in March of 1962 literally reflect the false flag proposal submitted to Kennedy in 1960 by senator Smathers.

In the freshly released documents by the JFK Memorial Library, Smathers- who frequently joined John F. Kennedy on trips to the south- admits that he proposed the idea of a false flag attack on Gitmo during a conversation with the President-to-be. After the “killing Castro” propiosal was discarded by Kennedy, Smathers suggested provoking an incident at the US Naval base at Guantanamo Bay on the eastern tip of Cuba as a pretext for a US invasion. Smathers:

“I did talk to him about a plan of having a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and do the job. He asked me to write him something about it. And I think I did.”

As noted this very proposal by Smathers in 1960 is stunningly similar to the infamous Northwoods document, signed by chairman Lyman Lemnitzer, in which the Joint Chiefs of Staff propose some pretty criminal things, among which the one proposed by Smathers to Kennedy in 1960. Under “Incidents to establish a credible attack” the Joint Chiefs came up with the following proposals in regards to the US naval base at Gitmo:

1- Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.
2- Land friendly Cubans in uniform “over-the-fence” to stage attack on base.
3- Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
4- Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).
5- Blow up ammunition inside the base; start fires.
6- Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
7- Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. Some damage to installations.
8- Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.
9- Capture militia group which storms the base.
10- Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires.
11- Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims.

In a February 2 1962 memorandum titled “Possible Actions to Provoke, Harass or Disrupt Cuba,” written by Gen. William H. Craig and submitted to Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the commander of the Operation Mongoose project outlines Operation Bingo- a plan to “create an incident which has the appearance of an attack on U.S. facilities (GMO) in Cuba, thus providing an excuse for use of U.S. military might to overthrow the current government of Cuba.”

In the context of Operation Mongoose, a highly classified US military operation, the refusal of Kennedy to put his signature under the before mentioned proposals is especially significant. According to countless sources from inside and outside the American intelligence communities, Mongoose was the infrastructure under which the assassination of Kennedy in ’63 has been carried out. Mongoose was in fact one of the largest covert operations ever conducted in the United States. It involved universities, military bases, individuals, businesses and government agencies- all neatly compartmentalized, of course.

Later, just about the time the Joint Chiefs of Staff submitted their operation Northwoods document to the President, Smathers recalled Kennedy telling him:

“George, I’d love to have you over … but I want you to do me a favour. I’d like to visit with you, I want to discuss things with you but I don’t want you to talk to me anymore about Cuba.”

Smathers said he didn’t bring it up again until the President invited him to an informal dinner some time after:

“I remember the President was actually fixing our own dinner and I raised the question of Cuba and what could be done and so on,” he related. “And I remember that he took his fork and just hit his plate and it cracked and he said, ‘Now, dammit, I wish you wouldn’t do that. Let’s quit talking about this subject.”

The revealing aspects of the Smathers confessions released by the JFK Memorial Library can hardly be overestimated. By the time Kennedy was presented with Operation Northwoods, he must have recognized the striking similarities to the Gitmo false flag proposal by Smathers. And just like in 1960, he firmly rejected the plans.

Source: https://share.banoosh.com/2012/08/21/bombshell-senator-suggested-false-flag-attack-to-kennedy-2-years-prior-to-operation-northwoods-proposal/

Filed Under: Corruption, Crime, Cuba, False Flag Attacks, Law, Media, Military, Murder, Politics, Tyranny, USA, War

Apple Rejects App That Tracks U.S. Drone Strikes

August 30, 2012 By 4 Comments

Originally posted by Christina Bonnington and Spencer Ackerman on Wired.com, August 30, 2012

It seemed like a simple enough idea for an iPhone app: Send users a pop-up notice whenever a flying robots kills someone in one of America’s many undeclared wars. But Apple keeps blocking the Drones+ program from its App Store — and therefore, from iPhones everywhere. The Cupertino company says the content is “objectionable and crude,” according to Apple’s latest rejection letter.

A mockup of developer Josh Begley’s drone-strike app for iOS. Wired.com

It’s the third time in a month that Apple has turned Drones+ away, says Josh Begley, the program’s New York-based developer. The company’s reasons for keeping the program out of the App Store keep shifting. First, Apple called the bare-bones application that aggregates news of U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia “not useful.” Then there was an issue with hiding a corporate logo. And now, there’s this crude content problem.

Begley is confused. Drones+ doesn’t present grisly images of corpses left in the aftermath of the strikes. It just tells users when a strike has occurred, going off a publicly available database of strikes compiled by the U.K.’s Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which compiles media accounts of the strikes.

iOS developers have a strict set of guidelines that must be adhered to in order to gain acceptance into the App Store. Apps are judged on technical, content and design criteria. As Apple does not comment on the app reviews process, it can be difficult to ascertain exactly why an app got rejected. But Apple’s team of reviewers is small, sifts through up to 10,000 apps a week, and necessarily errs on the side of caution when it comes to potentially questionable apps.

Apple’s original objections to Drones+ regarded the functionality in Begley’s app, not its content. Now he’s wondering if it’s worth redesigning and submitting it a fourth time.

“If the content is found to be objectionable, and it’s literally just an aggregation of news, I don’t know how to change that,” Begley says.

Begley’s app is unlikely to be the next Angry Birds or Draw Something. It’s deliberately threadbare. When a drone strike occurs, Drones+ catalogs it, and presents a map of the area where the strike took place, marked by a pushpin. You can click through to media reports of a given strike that the Bureau of Investigative Reporting compiles, as well as some basic facts about whom the media thinks the strike targeted. As the demo video above shows, that’s about it.

It works best, Begley thinks, when users enable push notifications for Drones+. “I wanted to play with this idea of push notifications and push button technology — essentially asking a question about what we choose to get notified about in real time,” he says. “I thought reaching into the pockets of U.S. smartphone users and annoying them into drone-consciousness could be an interesting way to surface the conversation a bit more.”

But that conversation may not end up occurring. Begley, a student at Clay Shirky’s lab at NYU’s Interactive Telecommunications Program, submitted a threadbare version of Drones+ to Apple in July. About two weeks later, on July 23, Apple told him was just too blah. “The features and/or content of your app were not useful or entertaining enough,” read an e-mail from Apple Begley shared with Wired, “or your app did not appeal to a broad enough audience.”

Finally, on Aug. 27, Apple gave him yet another thumbs down. But this time the company’s reasons were different from the fairly clear-cut functionality concerns it previously cited. “We found that your app contains content that many audiences would find objectionable, which is not in compliance with the App Store Review Guidelines,” the company e-mailed him.

It was the first time the App Store told him that his content was the real problem, even though the content hadn’t changed much from Begley’s initial July submission. It’s a curious choice: The App Store carries remote-control apps for a drone quadricopter, although not one actually being used in a war zone. And of course, the App Store houses innumerable applications for news publications and aggregators that deliver much of the same content provided by Begley’s app.

Wired reached out to Apple on the perplexing rejection of the app, but Apple was unable to comment.

Begley is about at his wits end over the iOS version of Drones+. “I’m kind of back at the drawing board about what exactly I’m supposed to do,” Begley said. The basic idea was to see if he could get App Store denizens a bit more interested in the U.S.’ secretive, robotic wars, with information on those wars popping up on their phones the same way an Instagram comment or retweet might. Instead, Begley’s thinking about whether he’d have a better shot making the same point in the Android Market.

Drones+ iPhone App from Josh Begley on Vimeo.

Source: https://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/08/drone-app/

Filed Under: Censorship, Genocide, Internet, Media, Military, Murder, Pakistan, Technology, Terrorism, USA, War, Weapons

Two Dead Bodies Found at Queen’s Estates

January 5, 2012 By Leave a Comment

“Yet another DEAD BODY Ma’am!”

CHRIS EVERARD Reports on the growing Royal Body Count - two more bodies have been found on royal properties - a woman on the Sandringham estate, and a man found in a tree stump close to the gates of Buckingham Palace in London:

3rd January 2012:

Yet another dead body has been found on a Royal Estate. This time, a woman, found dead near the pony track which the Queen was photographed near yesterday. This is the second body to be found in recent years - virtually on the Queen’s doorstep. How many dead bodies have you ever found on YOUR doorstep? None, right? So this last couple of ‘royal corpses’ will take a lot of brooms to sweep under a very plush carpet…

Historical journals, confessions and letters of State all show us that the royals often conduct a killing spree eradicating ‘people who knew too much’. We see this in the annals of the British, Bavarian and Russian royal houses. Grand Duke Dimitri strangled Rasputin with his own hands - when push comes to shove, some royals don’t mind getting their hands dirty. The big question is this; is the Royal Killing Season still continuing in our day and age? Many bodies have been found on royal estates over the years, however, to date, not a single member of the royal family been questioned by the police. ‘The Palace’, you see, in matters such as this, perform an ‘internal enquiry’ before a policeman is ever allowed to enter a royal residence - even when investigating a murder charge.
So, do the Royals kill people? Oh yes. It is proven through documents and letters that many, many people have been murdered at the hands of the royals - or by ‘royal decree’. I have made a two hour documentary, called MURDERED BY THE MONARCHY’ which clearly lists all the Royal Murders. The latest BBC newsfeed says;

An investigation is under way after human remains were found in woodland on the Queen’s estate in Norfolk on New Year’s Day.

Detectives from Norfolk Constabulary were alerted to the discovery by a member of the public at Anmer, which lies on the Royal Family’s Sandringham Estate.

A police spokesman confirmed that the remains found were that of a single body. The area was sealed off and a detailed search is being carried out.

The force said: “Detectives from Norfolk Constabulary have launched an investigation following the discovery of human remains in an area of woodland at Anmer, near King’s Lynn. “The remains were found by a member of the public who reported the incident to police on Sunday January 1 shortly after 4pm.

Buckingham Palace said it had no comment to make as it is “a matter for Norfolk police”.


“MURDERED BY THE MONARCHY” is a two hour documentary charting the strangulations, torture, beatings, rapes, enforced imprisonment and child murders perpetrated by the royal families throughout history. CLICK HERE to read reviews of the DVD at the Enima Channel Cyberstore.

The general public in Britain all have grave doubts over the crash which killed Princess Diana in 1997. Since the year of Diana’s death, popularity of the royals has undergone an earthquake-magnitude crack. Mohammed AlFayed has described the crash which killed Princess Diana and his son, Dodi AlFayed, as “black and white murder” - an organised crash, in which several vehicles driven by Her Majesty’s Intelligence Officers took part in orchestrating the tragic events. Since Diana’s death, several years passed before someone from Buckingham Palace even bothered to visit Diana’s memorial. Her former husband, Prince Charles, who Princess Diana identified as being the killer - in a note she wrote to her lawyer, Lord Mischon, shortly before her death has not, as far as we know, paid his respects at Diana’s memorial so far. Four years after the tragic crash, Diana’s brother, Earl Spencer implied a grievance that Charles had failed to visit Princess Diana’s grave since her burial. He implied during a BBC interview that he believed the Prince had relegated his former wife to a ‘memory’ and wanted to draw a line under his marriage.

Criticism is NOT Tolerated…
Another recent case of a body being found on a royal property is Robert James Moore. Found dead just yards from the Queen’s front door. Mr Moore, allegedly sent hundreds of “strange and offensive” packages to the Queen over a period of 15 years, including, so Her Majesty’s Constabulary say, obscene photographs. Some of the “peculiar” letters ran to 600 pages, and he had also posted a copy of his passport and boxes falsely warning that they contained dangerous substances.

He had obviously been wronged in some way - and he set up a little crow’s nest watch in a tree close to the gates of Buckingham Palace.

His body was found there by a tree surgeon - and was already decomposing. That’s right - right at the gates of Buckingham Palace, in a tree stump, in a royal park, in the centre of London - the official story says that Mr Moore’s body was unnoticed by millions of tourists for three years.
Many have rumoured that Mr Moore was killed - and the official story is that his body - found in a tree stump virtually at the gates of Buckingham Palace - is a ‘placement’ killing - where the actual crime took place elsewhere, or at the same place, but was then stored and replaced at the original crime scene by the murderer.

It seems obvious that Mr Moore was murdered - and was possibly the latest in a very long line of people murdered because they know ‘Royal Secrets’ and intended to get ‘even’.

History tells us that the act of killing - for the royals - comes with the waive of the hand, a deep stare, a telephone call - it’s all done in great hush hush whispers - by distant decree. But what would a royal killer do with the bodies? Simple, you just ‘leave them’ - after all, the royals own huge swathes of wild woodland everywhere - not difficult to stash a victim’s body and then let nature take it’s course.

Mr Moore’s body, is supposedly being investigated by Det Sgt Mike West, from Marylebone police station. We wish the Detective luck.

“MURDERED BY THE MONARCHY” features interviews with DAVID ICKE and the author of Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence, Mr Jon King.

Source: https://christophereverard.blogspot.com/2012/01/two-dead-bodies-found-at-queens-estates.html

Filed Under: Featured, Murder, Royal Family