United Nations

Syrian Peace Deal: UN’s Cloak to NATO’s Dagger

April 10, 2012 By Aaron Jackson 1 Comment

Turkey begins fabricating “cross border” incidents to justify Brookings prescribed “safe havens” inside Syria.
by Tony Cartalucci on April 9, 2012

From the very beginning, US policy makers admitted that Kofi Annan’s “peace mission” to Syria was nothing more than a rouse to preserve NATO’s proxy forces from total destruction and create “safe havens” from which to prolong the bloodshed. It was hoped that with established “safe havens” in Syria, protected by Turkish military forces (Turkey has been a NATO member since 1952) violence and pressure verses the Syrian government could be perpetually increased until it finally collapsed and the carving up of Syria could commence.

Photo: Annan is a trustee of Wall Street speculator George Soros and geopolitical manipulator Zbigniew Brzezinski’s International Crisis Group (ICG), along side Neo-Conservative corporate lobbyist and warmonger Kenneth Adelman, US State Department-listed Iranian terror organization MEK lobbyist - General Wesley Clark, Wall Street-backed color revolution leader- Mohammed ElBaradei of Egypt, and Brookings Institution’s Samuel Berger. Serving as “advisers” to the International Crisis Group include, Neo-Conservative warmonger Richard Armitage, former Foreign Minister of Israel Shlomo Ben-Ami, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Bank of Israel Governor Stanely Fischer, and President of Israel Shimon Peres. While Annan poses as a representative of the “United Nations” he is in reality representing the pro-regime change agenda of the ICG and the special interests that fund its work.

….

This has been confirmed by Fortune 500-funded, US foreign-policy think-tank, Brookings Institution which has blueprinted designs for regime change in Libya as well as both Syria andIran. In their latest report, “Assessing Options for Regime Change” it is stated (emphasis added):

“An alternative is for diplomatic efforts to focus first on how to end the violence and how to gain humanitarian access, as is being done under Annan’s leadership.This may lead to the creation of safe-havens and humanitarian corridors, which would have to be backed by limited military power. This would, of course, fall short of U.S. goals for Syria and could preserve Asad in power. From that starting point, however, it is possible that a broad coalition with the appropriate international mandate could add further coercive action to its efforts.” -page 4, Assessing Options for Regime Change, Brookings Institution.

Click to enlarge

Image: Also out of the Brookings Institution, Middle East Memo #21 “Assessing Options for Regime Change (.pdf),” makes no secret that the humanitarian “responsibility to protect” is but a pretext for long-planned regime change.

….

And while “peace” was being peddled by Soros-funded International Crisis Group trustee Kofi Annan, the US, UK, France, and members of the West’s proxy Arab League simultaneously called for Assad to stand down and withdraw troops from secured cities while openly declaring that arms and cash would continue to flow to the rebels. The “Friends of Syria” summit would even ludicrously declare that “wages” would be paid to rebels to continue their battle to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Clearly the label “peace deal” is inappropriate for a proposal that seeks to empower and indeed see one side prevail militarily over another whose hands are purposefully tied. It is an unconditional surrender to foreign-funded terrorists simply labeled as a “peace deal.”

The Brookings Institution’s “safe havens” and “humanitarian corridors” are meant to be established by NATO-member Turkey, who has been threatening to partially invade Syria for weeks in order to accomplish this. And while Turkey claims this is based on “humanitarian concerns,” examining Turkey’s abysmal human rights record in addition to its own ongoing genocidal campaign against the Kurdish people both within and beyond its borders, it is clear they are simply fulfilling the agenda established by their Western patrons on Wall Street and in the city of London.

Photo: Turkish tanks entering Iraq to raid Kurdish towns and hunt suspected rebels in 2008. More recently, Turkey has been bombing “suspected” rebel bases in both Turkey and Iraq, as well as conducting mass nationwide arrests. Strangely, as Turkey verifiably does what Libya’s Qaddafi and Syria’s Assad have been accused of doing, in all of their hypocrisy, are now calling for a partial invasion of Syria based on “humanitarian concerns.”

….Now, Turkey is fabricating stories involving Syrian troops “firing across” the Turkish-Syrian border. The New York Times published these bold accusations before admitting further down that “it was unclear what kind of weapons caused the injuries on Sunday around six miles inside Turkish territory,” and that “there were conflicting accounts about the incident.” As are all the accusations used by NATO, the UN, and individual member states to justify meddling in Syria’s affairs, these tales involve hear-say from the rebels themselves.

It is clear that Turkey, NATO, and the UN are attempting to set the pretext for the establishment of “safe havens” and “humanitarian corridors” intended to circumvent the UN Security Council which has seen attempts to green-light military intervention vetoed twice by Russia and China. As the UN “peace deal” deadline of April 10 comes and goes, we can expect an ever increasing din of propaganda purporting Syrian violations against Turkish sovereignty, the continued propaganda campaign accentuating the “victimization” of NATO’s death squads, and the public roll-out of Brookings’ Turkish established “safe haven” within Syrian territory.

Image: Some of the corporate sponsors behind the Brookings Institution, from whose playbook Kofi Annan is being directed in his disingenuous “peace mission” to Syria. (click image to enlarge)

Image: Just some of the corporate and “institutional” sponsors of the International Crisis Group, upon which Kofi Annan sits as a “trustee” with other dubious personalities including George Soros, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Israeli President Shimon Peres, Egypt’s Mohammed ElBaradei, and Neo-Cons Richard Armitage and Kenneth Adelman. (click image to enlarge)

….The UN “peace deal” was a rouse from the beginning. The West has no intention of leaving Syria intact and will seek all means by which to prevail in toppling the government, carving up the country along sectarian lines, plunging it into perpetual violence as it has Libya, and moving next toward Iran. While it is essential to expose the truth behind Syria’s unrest, is also important to identify the corporate-financier interests driving this nefarious agenda and boycott them entirely while seeking out viable local solutions to support instead. If none exist, it is our duty to use our time, money, attention, and resources to create such alternatives instead of perpetuating the self-serving agenda unfolding before us.

Ultimately it is “we the people” paying into this current paradigm that allows it to continue moving forward, therefore it by necessity must be “we the people” who undermine and ultimately replace it.

Source: https://landdestroyer.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/syrian-peace-deal-uns-cloak-to-natos.html

Filed Under: Africa, British Petroleum, China, Corporations, France, Genocide, Human Rights, Iran, Libya, Military Industrial Complex, NATO, Russia, Safety, Syria, Terrorism, Turkey, United Kingdom, United Nations

Despite UN Denial, Numbers Prove Peacekeepers Wreaking Havoc in Haiti

December 11, 2011 By T Kelly Leave a Comment

The United Nations Peacekeeping operation in Haiti, MINUSTAH by its French acronym, has been the target of recent popular protests and a source of controversy because of its role in re-introducing cholera to Haiti, the sexual assault of a young Haitian man and other past abuses.

On November 3, 2011 the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti and Bureau des Avocats Internationaux filed a legal complaint on behalf of over 5,000 cholera victims seeking damages from the United Nations. The UN has so far not responded or given a timetable for a response.

Here is MINUSTAH, by the numbers:

Percent of worldwide UN peacekeepers that are in Haiti, despite it not being a war zone: 12.5

Number of MINUSTAH troops (military and police) currently in Haiti: 12,552

Rank in size among the 16 UN peacekeeping operations worldwide: 3

Rank in size of Darfur and the Democratic Republic of Congo, respectively: 1, 2

Percent of Haiti’s annual government expenditures to which MINUSTAH’s budget is equivalent: 50

Percent of Haiti’s GDP to which MINUSTAH’s budget is equivalent: 10.7

Total estimated cost of MINUSTAH since the earthquake:$1,556,461,550

Percent of UN peacekeeping operations worldwide funded by the United States: 27

Percent the U.S. has disbursed out of its $1.15 billion pledge at the March 2010 donor conference: 18.8

Percent of the U.S.’ contributions to MINUSTAH since the earthquake that this represents: 41

Factor by which MINUSTAH’s budget exceeds the amount of funds the UN’s cholera appeal has raised: 8

Percent of MINUSTAH’s budget it would take to fully fund the UN’s cholera appeal: 1.7

Number of days operating expenses it would take to fund a cholera vaccination campaign that would cover the entire country: 18

Percent of a single day’s MINUSTAH budget that the cholera vaccination pilot program will use over its multiple-week lifespan: 40

Minimum number of people killed from cholera in Haiti since October 2010: 6,908

Number of people killed by homicide in Haiti in 2010: 689

Number of people, per 10 million (roughly the population of Haiti), killed by homicide in Brazil, the largest troop contributor to MINUSTAH: 2,270

Number of cholera victims who filed a claim with the UN seeking damages: 5,000

Number of cholera victims: 513,997

Rate per minute that Haitians were falling ill with cholera in July 2011: 1

Amount by which MINUSTAH’s budget exceeds the UN’s 2012 humanitarian appeal for Haiti: $562,517,100

Number of MINUSTAH personnel who were repatriated this year after a cell phone video emerged showing troops sexually assaulting a young Haitian man: 5

Number of successful prosecutions against over 100 MINUSTAH troops repatriated to Sri Lanka after allegations of involvement in child prostitution surfaced in 2007: 0

Number of standing claims commissions set up by the UN under Status of Forces Agreements so that local population may have means of redress from peacekeepers, historically: 0

Years MINUSTAH has been in Haiti: 7

Shortfall in trained national police officers that are supposed to take over for MINUSTAH: 10,000

Rank among Haiti’s top donors, including governments, that MINUSTAH would be if its budget went towards relief and reconstruction efforts: 3

Date on which cholera was discovered: October 21, 2010

Date the head of MINUSTAH was reported saying it was “really unfair” to accuse the UN of bringing cholera to Haiti: November 22, 2010

Distance, in miles, from the Nepalese MINUSTAH base to the location of the first reported case of cholera: .1

Date on which scientific paper confirmed that Haitian and Nepalese samples of cholera were “almost identical”: August 23, 2011

Days since the cholera outbreak it has taken for the UN to accept responsibility: 413 (and counting)

Date on which MINUSTAH’s mandate was extended through 2012: October 14, 2011

Percent of Haitians in a recent survey who said they wanted MINUSTAH gone within a year: 65

Source: https://www.truth-out.org/minustah-numbers/1323534211

Filed Under: Health, United Nations Tagged With: Haiti, Injustice, Peace-Keepers

Report: Russia Delivers Supersonic Cruise Missiles To Syria

December 4, 2011 By T Kelly Leave a Comment

Military source confirms delivery of missiles, according to an AFP report; second official says missiles will protect Syria from ‘possible attack from the sea.’

Russia has delivered supersonic cruise missiles to Syria, AFP reported on Thursday.

A military source told the Interfax news agency, “The Yakhont supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles have been delivered to Syria,” although it was not made clear exactly when the shipment was made.

A second Russian official speaking to Interfax said the missiles “will be able to protect Syria’s entire coast against a possible attack from the sea.”

Russia signed a contract reportedly worth at least $300 million in 2007 to supply Syria with cruise missiles, and Russia intended to deliver a total of 72 of the missiles to Syria, AFP reported.

It was not clear how many of the missiles have so far been delivered by Russia to Syria.

The delivery was made amid the continuing violent crackdown of Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime against the opposition, which according to a UN statement made on Thursday, has claimed 4,000 lives since March this year.

While international pressure against the Assad regime has increased over the past month, Moscow has stood by its ally, criticizing further sanctions slapped on Syria by Western and Arab League states.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov rejected calls at the United Nations for an arms embargo against Syria on Tuesday, saying that a similar move against Libya had proved one-sided, helping rebels to topple Gadhafi in August.

“We know how that worked in Libya when the arms embargo only applied to the Libyan army. The opposition received weapons, and countries like France and Qatar publicly spoke about it without shame,” he told a news conference.

Russia has close political and strategic relations with Assad’s government and has been one if its main arms suppliers. Syria accounted for 7 percent of Russia’s total of $10 billion in arms deliveries abroad in 2010, according to the Russian defense think-tank CAST.

Source: https://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/report-russia-delivers-supersonic-cruise-missiles-to-syria-1.399048

Filed Under: NATO, Syria, United Nations, USA, War, Weapons

West Demands Security Council Action On Syria

December 3, 2011 By T Kelly Leave a Comment

UNITED NATIONS (AFP) - The United States and Germany on Monday led Western calls for the divided UN Security Council to act on Syria’s deadly assault against protests after UN investigators said crimes against humanity had been committed.

“It is past time for the Security Council to take much more decisive action with respect to Syria,” said US ambassador Susan Rice. The Council cannot “stand idly by,” added Germany’s UN envoy Peter Wittig.

The 15-member council was split last month by a European-drafted resolution condemning President Bashar al-Assad’s crackdown. Russia and China vetoed the resolution, while Brazil, India, South Africa and Lebanon abstained.

But a report by a UN human rights commission, which said crimes against humanity had been ordered by the “highest levels” of Assad’s government, and the Arab League decision to order sanctions have strengthened the calls for action.

The United States and its European allies have already condemned the rare double veto by Russia and China.

But Rice said that with the Arab League sanctions and the “now well-documented atrocities” outlined in the UN report “we think it is time to revisit the question of what might be possible here in New York.”

Wittig called the Arab League sanctions “historic“. “The council here cannot stand idly by regarding what the regional organization has said so strongly. We think the council should take up that decision and endorse it and reinforce it,” he told reporters.

Rice and Wittig said informal talks on possible action would soon start.

Because of the internal divisions, the Security Council has so far only agreed a statement, with less moral weight, on the violence.

The 193 member UN General Assembly passed a resolution last week deploring the violence.

And rights groups also stepped up demands for Security Council action following the new UN report on killings and arrests in Syria since mid-March. The UN says more than 3,500 people have been killed.

Amnesty International called on the Security Council to refer the case to the International Criminal Court, order an arms embargo and freeze the assets of Assad and his associates.

“Continued inaction by the Security Council will not only allow the commission with impunity of more human rights violations in Syria, but embolden present and future violators,” said an Amnesty statement.

Human Rights Watch said the UN Human Rights Council must refer the Syria case to the UN Security Council and call for it “to impose targeted sanctions and refer the situation in Syria to the International Criminal Court.”

Source: https://www.activistpost.com/2011/11/west-demands-security-council-action-on.html

Filed Under: Crime, International Criminal Court, Law, Politics, United Nations

UN Report on Syria: Based on Witness Accounts … OUTSIDE of Syria

November 30, 2011 By T Kelly Leave a Comment

Wall Street and London’s media machine eagerly churned out headlines like BBC’s “Syria security forces ‘commit crimes against humanity‘” announcing the conclusions of a recent UN Human Rights Council report regarding the ongoing violence in Syria.

However, even upon reading the BBC article it is soon discovered that, “the investigation team members say they were denied entry into Syria itself,” and that the entirety of their “evidence” is garnered solely from interviews with “223 victims, witnesses and also army defectors to investigate alleged human rights violations.”

BBC’s article raises immediate suspicion over the veracity of the report, as “victims, witnesses, and defectors,” interviewed outside of Syria is not evidence, but rather more hearsay by groups of people with a vested interest in painting the Syrian government in the worst light possible.

However, upon actually reading the full text of the UN Human Rights Council report, we see just exactly “how” the report was compiled.

Under a section titled, “Methods of Work” we find a shocking admission of the utter lack of substance and immense conflict of interest behind the UN’s predetermined conclusion, that Syria is guilty of “crimes against humanity” and that the UN Security Council must act.

The report states:

First-hand information was collected through interviews with victims and witnesses of events in the Syrian Arab Republic.The interviewing process began in Geneva on 26 September 2011. Overall, 223 victims and/or witnesses, including personnel who defected from the military and the security forces, were interviewed.

A public call was made to all interested persons and organizations to submit relevant information and documentation that would help the commission implement its mandate. It held meetings with Member States from all regional groups, regional organizations, including the League of Arab States and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, non-governmental organizations, human rights defenders, journalists and experts. Reports, scholarly analyses and media accounts, as well as audio and visual material, were also duly considered.

The information collected is stored in a secure database governed by United Nations rules on confidentiality

Quite obviously this is not an investigation, nor is the information provided within the report “evidence” by any stretch of the imagination. The report would go on to admit that it received no cooperation from the Syrian government meaning that this publication by the UN is but a one-sided exercise to provide the worst possible image of the Syrian government as told by opposition groups now on record fully armed, foreign-backed, and trying to seize power by force.

The inclusion of “non-governmental organizations” (NGOs) should also raise immediate concerns. While the report is entirely negligent in listing any of these contributing NGOs, it is more than likely they include the US government and corporate-funded army of sedition emanating out of the National Endowment for Democracy, Geroge Soros’ Open Society Institute, and their myriad of subsidiaries. It has been these very NGOs supplying a steady stream of similarly baseless “witness accounts” since the unrest began earlier this year, as they’ve done in Libya, Belarus, Tunisia,Thailand, and beyond.

“Alleged” is used throughout the report in various forms further illustrating the tenuous nature of the UN Human Rights Council’s “evidence” while all of the testimony, those who gave it, and apparently the NGOs involved in compiling the UN report are conveniently kept “confidential.” This may be because the United Nations believes that its reputation coupled with global faith in its work is all that is necessary to lend their report the legitimacy it needs to bring Syria one step closer to NATO inflicted genocide.

However, considering Iraq and more recently Libya, and the UN’s complicit role in facilitating genocide in both nations based on similarly tenuous “human rights” reports, a clear pattern emerges. Human rights activists, their Wall Street and London-funded NGOs, and the disingenuous UN are merely dressing up with humanitarian concerns an otherwise naked campaign of military conquest.

In Part 1 & 2 of the video: “Lies behind the “Humanitarian War” in Libya.” The outrageous, confirmed, confessed “humanitarian-based” lies used with UN complicity to justify NATO’s invasion by proxy of Libya. Libya is now run by a corporate-backed proxy Abdurrahim el-Keib, formally of the British Petroleum (BP), Shell, France’s Total, Japan Oil Development Company, and Abu Dhabi National Oil Company-sponsored Petroleum Institute.

It has been pointed out in April’s “Globalists Coming Full Circle,” and more recently in Salon’s “Wes Clark and the neocon dream” that the unrest unhinging the Middle East, North Africa, and slowly creeping toward Moscow and Beijing, is part of a plan 20 years in the making. Those behind it just so happen to populate the boards of the faux-humanitarian front, National Endowment for Democracy (NED), have affiliations with the so-called “liberal” George Soros and his Open Society Institute, and have signed their names to Hitlerian declarations of world conquest within the notorious “Project for a New American Century.”

You’re not expected to read the report, let alone research the authors.

Without a doubt, the UN has compiled a tenuous and transparent fabrication of such little substance, those involved in writing it, Paulo Pinheiro, Yakin Ertürk, and Karen Koning AbuZayd, are clearly conspiring to justify an otherwise unjustifiable escalation in Syria’s current unrest. If they did indeed have evidence of Syrian brutality, they surely would have included it in their report and the voices at the BBC, on CNN, in Reuters and beyond would ceaselessly air it. Instead, the impact of the report solely depends on people trusting the legitimacy of the UN and not bothering to even objectively read it. It equally depends on members of the media, including the disingenuous hand-wringing “humanitarians” amongst NED’s vast global network to keep their heads down and not expose this willful duplicity.

The impact of the UN’s report also depends on people not bothering to research the associations of those who compiled it. Should they, they will find that Karen Koning AbuZayd is concurrently a member of the Washington D.C. based Middle East Policy Council, along side current and former associates of Exxon, the US military, the CIA, the Saudi Binladin Group, the US-Qatari Business Council and both former and current members of the US government. It is more than just a coincidence that the UN Human Rights Council report has given the US exactly what it wanted to hear regarding Syria, and one of those compiling the report just so happens to sit amongst an organization full of corporate-financier interests clamoring to despoil the Middle Eastern republic. Clearly, claims that the UN is merely a tool of corporate fascists on Wall Street and within the City of London represent a truth that confronts anyone who researches any of the claims coming out of the UN.

Indeed with this tissue of lies and the associations of the liars peddling them, the UN is truly a disingenuous tool of the world’s elite, used to strip the freedom and humanity of its enemies while simultaneously claiming to uphold such values in the process. The Syrian people are facing a criminal conspiracy of vast proportions in a world increasingly devoid of empathy, intelligence, or courage. Like the Libyans who fought for the better part of a year against the militant aggression of global corporate fascism, the Syrians will soon be fighting too.

For those indeed repulsed by what has transpired in Libya and what is facing Syria at the hands of the global elite, it should be obvious that the corporations, banks, and institutions involved need to be exposed, boycotted, and promptly replaced. It was Libya yesterday, Syria today, and inevitably you tomorrow.

Collectively after World War II we said, “never again,” regarding fascism and the rise of Adolf Hitler’s Germany, yet here we are . . . again.

Source: https://www.activistpost.com/2011/11/un-report-on-syria-based-on-witness.html

Filed Under: Corporations, Corruption, Human Rights, Imperialism, Media, Military Industrial Complex, Money, Prison, Syria, Torture, United Nations, USA Tagged With: Human Rights Abuses

Occupy Wall Street Declares Goldman Sachs Guilty

November 29, 2011 By T Kelly

General Assembly holds mock trial and journalist Chris Hedges reads indictment accusing Goldman Sachs of financial crimes against humanity.

Filed Under: Banks, Corporations, Corruption, Crime, Occupy, United Nations, USA Tagged With: Goldman Sachs, Indictment, Mock Trial

Closed-Door Politics: ‘Economic War’ Against Syria Seals Crisis

November 28, 2011 By T Kelly Leave a Comment

The Arab League’s sanctions against Damascus are in fact “a declaration of economic war” against the Syrian people, which “closed windows” for resolving the country’s crisis, the country’s senior diplomat says.

“Let them study the history of Syria very well,” Syrian FM Walid al-Moallem told reporters at a news conference on Monday. “Neither warnings nor sanctions will work with us.”

On November 27, the Arab League approved sweeping sanctions targeting Syria for its crackdown on protesters. The UN says more than 3,500 people have been killed during the 8-month-old uprising.

Moreover, the EU plans to tighten sanctions against Syria’s oil and financial sectors this coming Thursday, to deprive President Assad’s regime of more sources of funding, AFP reports.

EU foreign ministers are to adopt a raft of sanctions including bans on exporting gas and oil industry equipment to Syria, trading Syrian government bonds and selling software that could be used to monitor Internet and telephone communications.

Syria insists it is the victim of a foreign-supported insurgency by armed gangs, which al-Moallem attempted to prove by showing reporters footage of charred and bloodied corpses.

“I’m sorry for these gruesome pictures, but they are a gift for the members of the Arab League who still deny the presence of these armed gangs,” he said.

Al-Moallem noted that armed terrorist groups intensified their crimes after the army and security forces left some towns, reports Syria’s official news agency SANA.

“Stop funding gunmen in Syria and media instigation against it. We want you to take steps to control borders.We are prepared to cooperate with neighbouring countries,” he told the Arab League.

Also on Monday, the UN released a report that found Syrian troops committed ‘crimes against humanity’, including the killing of hundreds of children since the government crackdown began in March.

The report insists Syrian security forces, along with militias, were given ‘shoot-to-kill’ orders to crush demonstrations.

Meanwhile Russia’s foreign ministry says Moscow is closely-monitoring Arab League efforts to seek fast and peaceful way to settle the Syrian crisis without external interference.

“We presume that the priority here is to preserve the unity, territorial integrity and sovereignty of Syria as one of the key countries in the Middle East,” the statement reads.

Source:

https://rt.com/news/syria-sanctions-war-declaration-399

Filed Under: Economy, Syria, United Nations, USA

United Nations Nuclear Bank

November 24, 2011 By T Kelly Leave a Comment

The media hailed Warren Buffett last December for donating $50 million dollars toward a United Nations nuclear bank with control over uranium enrichment. The intent is control over nuclear weapons and nuclear power by the elites who are the true forces behind the UN.

The UN nuclear bank is will be under the authority of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is NOT independent; it was created through a UN treaty and answers to the UN and the UN Security Council. The fully funded UN nuclear bank does not require nations to stop uranium enrichment, which was the original plan; however, the final terms have not been set. The fuel bank will sell enriched uranium for power plants to countries in “good standing“. Therefore, only countries who kow-tow to the UN and IAEA will be provided with enriched uranium.

The United Nations is a supranational entity that answers to no one. After WWII, the UN was sold to the public as an voluntary collection of nations committed to peace and ending war. The UN pretends to vote on issues democratically, but its true goal is a totalitarian world government ruled by the elites at the top. They are happy to bully countries and go to war over resources, as evidenced by the UN resolution last week to attack Libya. They claim that war is necessary for peace.

The UN nuclear bank will consolidate power under the UN for nuclear energy and weaponry, which is another piece of UN Agenda 21, the blueprint for total control and depopulation.

UN WORLD DOMINANCE
Four things are needed to take political control over a population (the UN has set its sights on the entire world):

1. Money
2. An army
3. Control over the media
4. Control over education

If you have enough money and an army, then control over the media and education are useful but not essential.

UN NUCLEAR BANK FINANCING
Warren Buffet proposed the UN nuclear bank and made a self-serving “donation” of $50 million while demanding matching funds of $100 million from governments. Obama provided $50 million in US taxpayer money and the EU, UAE, Kuwait and Norway made up the rest. At $150 million, world domination is astonishingly cheap! Buffett, a proponent of depopulation, was celebrated as a hero in the media because most people are ignorant about the UN’s true goals.

Warren Buffett is in the energy utility business and owns MidAmerican Energy; his motivation for “donating” to the UN nuclear bank could benefit him later with regard to a UN monopoly over nuclear power for electricity.

Taxpayers will ultimately fund the UN nuclear bank that is in opposition to public interest and freedom. This trick is accomplished through foundations convincing governments to regulate or take action on an issue and then passing the cost on to taxpayers (click here to find out how individuals create public policy that has been used for depopulation).

Buffett proposed the UN nuclear bank through a foundation that he provides funding, called the ‘Nuclear Threat Initiative‘ (NTI). Ted Turner, known for supporting depopulation, is co-chairman of the Nuclear Threat Initiative and Sam Nunn, a former US Senator, is the other co-chair of NTI.

NUCLEAR SECURITY PROJECT
Nunn is the front man working with Cold-War hawks Henry Kissinger, former Secretary of State, George Schulz, former Defense Secretary and William Perry, former Secretary of State in the ‘Nuclear Security Project‘ to dismantle nuclear weapons. This project is supported by Zbigniew Brzezinski, Madeleine Albright, Colin Powell and many others.

Nunn, Kissinger, Schulz and Perry are aggressively pushing the dismantling of nuclear weapons through the US-Russia-UN START Treaty and the UN Non-Proliferation Treaty. The objective of these types of treaties, according to Department of State Publication 7277, is to disarm states to a “point where no state would have the military power to challenge the strengthened UN Peace Force….”

Buffett has provided funding for the Nuclear Security Project, too. Buffett said that an atomic attack on the US by mid-century is a “virtual certainty”. In my opinion, with psychopaths like Buffett, Turner and Kissinger (a Rockefeller lieutenant) at the helm, this is practically unavoidable.

CONCLUSION
As sovereign countries dismantle their nuclear weapons under UN treaties, the UN is simultaneously building its nuclear arsenal by way of the nuclear bank.

Additionally, the UN is locking in another uranium enrichment monopoly over nuclear power for electricity, which will also increase “interdependency of nations.”

SOLUTIONS:
Michael Shaw, UN Agenda 21 expert and president of FreedomAdvocates.org, says:

The UN has a plethora of schemes to advance the goal of world government. The most important of these is Agenda 21 Sustainable Development. This is the global to local movement designed under the cover of green to transform our systems of government and economics. Every county in America has adopted its Sustainable plan moving us all closer to the one world order where your unalienable rights are no longer politically recognized.

While there is little the citizen can do to halt the UN’s control of uranium, the typical American can do much toward exposing the local application of the UN’s march under the local Agenda 21 protocol. In particular, Americans need to understand city alliances with the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). ICLEI is an NGO, accredited by the United Nations for the purpose of implementing Agenda 21 at the local level. Such contracts have been entered into by over 600 American cities. This is treasonous.

In short, the Sustainable objective is the abolition of private property, education for global citizenship, and the use of technology to control human action. As ordinary people become aware of Agenda 21 hope rises that the Republic can be reestablished and that then the US can sever its ties with the United Nations and end the globalists’ one world ambition.

For full analysis of Agenda 21 Sustainable Development visit www.FreedomAdvocates.org.

Source: https://www.activistpost.com/2011/03/united-nations-nuclear-bank.html

Filed Under: Nuclear, United Nations

Khymer Rouge Leaders Go On Trial In Cambodia Charged With Genocide

November 22, 2011 By T Kelly Leave a Comment

Three senior regime members appear at UN-backed tribunal accused of playing key part in death of 1.7 million people

Three surviving members of the Khymer Rouge leadership have gone on trial at a UN-backed tribunal in Cambodia, accused of playing a key role in the death of at least 1.7 million people during one of the 20th century’s most brutal regimes.

In their opening statements, prosecutors emphasised the chaos and horror that overran Cambodia during the Khymer Rouge’s brief, paranoid and bloody rule from 1975 to 1979.

“Every Cambodian who was alive during this period was affected by the criminal system of oppression which these accused put in place. The death toll is staggering,” Chea Leang, the Cambodian co-prosecutor, told a packed tribunal in the capital, Phnom Penh.

Facing charges including crimes against humanity, genocide, religious persecution, homicide and torture, are three of the Khymer Rouge’s top leaders under the supreme ruler, Pol Pot, who died in 1998. Nuon Chea, 85, was the Khmer Rouge’s chief ideologist and “Brother Number Two” to Pol Pot; Khieu Samphan, 80, served as president; and 86-year-old Ieng Sary was the regime’s foreign minister. All showed little reaction as the charges were read out.

Chea Leang gave an overview of the alleged offences, before more detailed testimony next month:

“The forced evacuations of Cambodian cities, the enslavement of millions of people in forced labour camps, the smashing of hundreds of thousands of lives in notorious security centres and the killing fields, and the extermination of minorities, the countless deaths from disease, abuse and starvation – these crimes ordered and orchestrated by the accused were among the worst horrors inflicted on any nation in modern history.”

It is the first time that such senior regime figures have faced trial, and, given their ages, many presume they will die before the long and complex case is completed.

A fourth defendant, 79-year-old Ieng Thirith, Ieng Sary’s wife and the Khymer Rouge’s minister for social affairs, was ruled unfit to stand trial last week because she has Alzheimer’s disease.

The joint tribunal, set up in 2006 after long negotiations between the UN and Cambodia’s government, has thus far only completed one case. Kaing Guek Eav, known as Comrade Duch, was jailed for his role in the deaths of more than 14,000 people while running the notorious Tuol Sleng torture centre.

Andrew Cayley, the international co-prosecutor, said the defendants’ ages and the decades that have passed since the crimes should not tempt the court into compassion. “They murdered, tortured and terrorised their own people, they unleashed a radical social reformed process … to create a living nightmare for all Khmer. They took from the people everything that makes life worth living. Let us never for one moment forget in this trial that this is the tragic legacy that these elderly people represent.”

The Khymer Rouge in effect turned the entire country into a forced labour camp as they pursued their goal of a pure, agrarian socialist society, purging the middle classes and intellectuals in particular. Between 1.7 million and 2.2 million people – from a pre-regime population of about 7 million – were murdered or died from illness, overwork or starvation.

The tribunal is intended to act in part as a reminder of the Khymer Rouge’s crimes in a country in which the great majority of the population was born after its fall.

Many of those attending the opening day of the case had their own appalling stories of life under the Khymer Rouge. Chim Phorn, 72, said that as chief of a commune in the country’s north-west he had been forced to beat to death an unmarried young couple who became romantically involved. “I was ordered to kill the young couple because they fell in love without being married. If I did not kill them, my supervisor would have killed me, so to save my life, I had no choice but to kill them,” he said.

Chum Noeu, 62, who lost 13 relatives under the regime, said: “We want justice so that the dead can finally close their eyes. What is the truth behind all of torture and killings? What happened?”

The defendants have shown no willingness so far to co-operate and are expected to deny any responsibility.

Source: https://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/21/khmer-rouge-leaders-trial-cambodia?intcmp=239

Filed Under: Cambodia, Genocide, United Nations

Foreign Intervention in Syria: What Will The West Do?

October 31, 2011 By Aaron Jackson 1 Comment

While the death toll in Syria has risen above 3,000 and as demonstrators have called for a no-fly zone, the US and its allies have remained wary of intervening as they have in Libya. Unlike the late Muammar el-Gaddafi, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has a number of powerful allies: Syria is the closest Arab ally to Iran and has ties to both Lebanon’s powerful Hezbollah movement and the militant Palestinian Hamas, as well as to other groups. Earlier this month, a United Nations Security Council resolution to impose strict sanctions on Syria failed because of Russia’s and China’s vetoes.

In an interview on a Russian TV channel on Sunday, Assad indeed emphasized the “strong ties” between Syria and Russia in. China has been an ally of Syria, but China’s Middle Eastern envoy, Wu Sike, is urging Assad to “speed up” reform. Speaking in Cairo after a visit to Syria, Wu called on the Syrian government to make “palpable reform” and to “respect and respond to the aspirations and rightful demands of the Syrian people, adding that “the situation was dangerous and the bloodshed could not continue.”

In another sign of international efforts to address the crackdown in Syria, officials from the Arab League met with Syrian officials in Qatar on Sunday and made a “serious” proposal for Assad’s regime to end the killings and violence. Arab leaders, mindful of calls for more democratic reforms in their own countries, have been “aware of the potentially seismic geopolitical implications if Assad were to fall” and so have tempered their criticism of him.

Assad’s First Interview with Western Journalist Since Uprising Began

Sunday also saw Assad giving his first interview with a Western journalist since the uprising began in March, amid reports that 50 civilians and members of the security forces had been killed in the past 48 hours. In the Sunday Telegraph interview, Assad said that foreign intervention could turn Syria into “another Afghanistan” and noted that Western nations “are going to ratchet up the pressure, definitely.” Describing Syria as “different in every respect from Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen” and the “hub” of the region,” Assad said that “any problem in Syria will burn the whole region.” He recalled an armed uprising of the Muslim Brotherhood that his father had brutally repressed in the city of Hama in 1982 and added that “we are still fighting with them.”

Saying that “many mistakes” had been made in the early days of the uprising, Assad claimed that “only terrorists” are now being targeted and claimed that his government had not gone down the “road of stubborn government,” but had called for reforms six days after the protests began.

In an interview with Al Jazeera, the British journalist who interviewed Assad, Andrew Gilligan, noted that he was “reasonably relaxed, and quite personable” and “not the stereotypical Arab dictator.”

Assad has lifted Syria’s long-time emergency law and given citizenship to thousands of previously stateless Kurds. But opponents have decreed his reforms to be empty and hollow as civilians, including some 200 children, have continued to be arrested, tortured and killed. Assad is “inviting an intervention,” Louay Safi, a member of the opposition Syrian National Council, said, emphasizing that “there’s only so much the world can bear in terms of force against unarmed civilians.” The protests are driven not by an Islamist agenda, but by a call for greater for freedoms and real democratic reforms.

Dozens Killed This Past Weekend

Many of those recently killed were residents of the city of Homs, which has been the center of protests for months. Activists reported that security forces shelled houses and used live bullets against protesters this weekend. The government said that 20 security forces had been killed in Homs and ten in northern Idlib province when their bus was ambushed. As Syria bars the foreign media from reporting from within its borders, it has been difficult to gain a precise sense of the situation, with reports coming from activists and residents often in contradiction to those issued via the state-owned media.

Source: https://www.care2.com/causes/foreign-intervention-in-syria-what-will-the-west-do.html

Filed Under: China, Military, Russia, Syria, United Nations, USA, War