January 21, 2013

Global Health Organization To Purchase Millions Of Toxic HPV Vaccines To Administer To Women And Girls In Third-World Countries

At its recent board meeting in Bangladesh, the GAVI Alliance, formerly known as the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations, announced plans to bring the deadly human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines Gardasil (Merck & Co.) and Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline) into the third world. A pro-vaccination group backed by the World Bank, UNICEF, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the vaccine industry, GAVI’s stated goal is to vaccinate 240 million children by 2015.

As many as two million women and girls in nine unidentified developing countries could soon receive one of the two HPV vaccines, even though HPV is potentially linked to only one percent, of all cervical cancers, according to some reports (https://washingtonexaminer.com/node/…). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), however, has stated that “HPV is not associated with cervical cancer” at all (https://www.naturalnews.com/022404.html).

And yet the vaccine industry through its various “nonprofit” and government partnership continues to push the deadly vaccine on young girls, women, and now even young boys around the world, despite the fact that it does not work and can cause horrific side effects. According to the latest figures released by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Gardasil alone has caused more than 20,000 adverse events and 71 known deaths since it was first unveiled (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/va…).

These figures are actually higher when taking into account the 26 additional deaths concealed in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) documents that were recently exposed by Judicial Watch, a public watchdog group. SaneVax, a vaccine group that tracks HPV vaccine cases, says there have actually been more than 23,300 adverse events and 103 deaths caused by HPV vaccines, to date (https://sanevax.org/).

With all this in mind, it is concerning, to say the least, that GAVI is advocating that the poorest women and children in the world be subjected to this chemical poison. Nevertheless, the group is reportedly working on a deal with both Merck and GSK to get the vaccines at a reduced rate, and the UN World Bank will be issuing bonds to countries in order to fund the whole HPV vaccine campaign.

A GAVI press release also states that the group will push rubella vaccines along with the HPV vaccines. The goal is to vaccinate 588 million children against rubella by 2015.

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/034269_global_health_HPV_vaccines.html#ixzz1fBix0mv1

Environmentalists Attack Pacific Pipeline Plan

OTTAWA — Environmental groups attacked a proposed pipeline from Canada’s oil sands to the Pacific coast on Tuesday, saying it would attract tanker shipping and risk oil spills along a pristine coastline.

A report by the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Pembina Institute and the Living Oceans Society said the project posed risks to communities, salmon-bearing rivers, and coastal ecosystems, including the habitat of a rare white bear.

“The Northern Gateway pipeline is not worth the risk for the communities, rivers and Pacific coastline of British Columbia,” said Nathan Lemphers, a policy analyst with the Pembina Institute.

The pipeline, proposed by Canadian company Enbridge, would transport oil from Alberta’s tar sands through nearly 1,200 kilometers (750 miles) of rugged mountain landscapes to Kitimat on British Columbia’s northern coast, for eventual shipping to Asia.

Up to 220 supertankers each year would sip from it, the report estimated.

“History has shown that oil tankers come with oil spills. It is not a question of if, but when, a spill will happen,” said Katie Terhune of the Living Oceans Society.

Source: https://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/11/29/environmentalists-attack-pacific-pipeline-plan

U.S. Issues “Emergency” Warning for Americans to ‘Immediately” Leave Syria

The U.S. Embassy continues to urge U.S. citizens in Syria to depart immediately while commercial transportation is available. The number of airlines serving Syria has decreased significantly since the summer, while many of those airlines remaining have reduced their number of flights. Please take this opportunity to review our most recent Travel Warning for Syria.

U.S. citizens living or traveling in Syria are encouraged to enroll in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP). U.S. citizens without internet access may enroll directly at the nearest U.S. Embassy or U.S. Consulate. By enrolling, U.S. citizens make it easier for the embassy/consulates to contact them in case of emergency.

https://travel.state.gov/travel/tips/emergencies/emergencies_1212.html

 

 

Source: https://www.activistpost.com/2011/11/us-issues-emergency-warning-for.html

 

 

A Raging State Of Paranoia

By R.F. Goggin, Contributing Writer for Activist Post, on October 30, 2011

Remember the days in the U.S., when it was generally considered rude to spy on your neighbor? Or, when minding one’s own business used to be a kind of unspoken virtue? Well, although ‘the times they are a changing’, that doesn’t necessarily mean that Americans, as a people, would be better served to change along with them.In the United States, before we are condemned by the state, we are routinely informed of the right we have to remain silent. But in case it’s become obscure somehow for an average Joe, when it comes to the ‘business’ of Homeland Security, one also has an inherent right to remain non-compliant to the state of paranoia in America that has yet to enthrall the majority of the people in the same outrageous manner it has our nation’s leaders. Do ordinary U.S. citizens, actually need to take the advice of a public servant like ‘Janet Napolitano’ and function as an operative of their government? Must we really become estranged from or suspicious of one another as a matter of daily routine? Is this “If you see something, say something” mentality and campaign, taking shape out of Washington, all that fundamentally wise or necessary to begin with?

Well, I am definitely seeing something strange that is going on, so perhaps I had better ‘say something’.

I have a sneaking suspicion that one does not actually decide to become a ‘Libertarian’ these days, as opposed to a Republican or Democrat, but that they are left with little choice in the matter, when they see the political establishment in America gradually eroding their civil liberties for what are basically misleading, self-serving reasons of not protecting you or I, per se, but the state itself. And in most cases, isn’t it moreover just our ‘dedicated’ public officials trying to protect their own jobs? It’s clear enough to me at least, that the more the U.S. government is able to entrench this ‘keep your eyes peeled’ mindset of fear for one’s own personal safety into the public dialogue, then the less of an ‘individual’ (with all your liberties intact) an average or ordinary U.S. citizen will be. This is of course, unless you are perfectly willing to buy into a mass delusion being perpetuated by people living in a gated community of their own minds, consisting of freedom-encroaching plots and ideas.

In this day and age, in order for a Washington politician or bureaucrat to stay relevant or stable within some comfortable salary or station, they are going tell you that in this super-power in which you live, that you are simply ‘not safe.’ They are going to warn you about terrorists in our midst, whom for all intents and purposes, have already fulfilled their mission of sowing a very real sense of fear and disharmony into the American psyche. Is it really worth keeping ourselves safe at all freedom-loving cost, if we’re to all but cower against an unseen enemy on U.S. soil?

Benjamin Franklin, once said, “It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority.” Well at the moment, there are protest movements taking place across the country doing just that. And I would be willing to bet that this founding father of whom I speak, were he watching from above, might hold nothing other than admiration toward the demonstrators and the chant which some were using, when they called into question an authority (NYPD) standing in the path of their forward progress.

“Who are you protecting!”

Should not those currently protesting across the country, by definition of a ‘nanny’ or a police state, be considered a threat to homeland security? You had better believe it, Mr. or Mrs. American citizen. Money loves money in a materialistic society, and so those who are going to get any real government protection or who will benefit most from the department of ‘homeland security’ in the end, will be those distinguishable, well off Americans with the most to gain — or to protect — through its implementation.

All that is necessary, it would seem to me, to begin to reverse this overbearing corruption of power in the most militarily secure nation in the world, is for every American to understand that it is hardly their patriotic duty to become an unpaid secret agent of the state, but instead to insist on taking responsibility for their own personal well-being — and to be content with nothing more.

Source: https://www.activistpost.com/2011/10/raging-state-of-paranoia.html