Gerald Celente: We’re Going Into An Economic 9/11
The new job numbers are out for the month of November. The Labor Department announced that unemployment is declining and was 8.6 percent for last month.
Roughly 120 thousand private jobs were created in the month of November, but critics say retail and hospitality jobs aren’t the type of jobs America needs.
Others say that this doesn’t make up for the new people joining the workforce.
Gerald Celente, publisher of The Trends Journal, sounds off on the issue.
9/11 - A Conspiracy Theory
Everything you ever wanted to know about the 9/11 conspiracy theory in under 5 minutes.
The Failure to Investigate 9/11 Has Bankrupted America
Preface: This post does not discuss whether or not 9/11 was a “false flag” operation or an “inside job”. Anything other than a discussion of the negligence of the Bush administration is unnecessary for the purposes of this essay, and is thus beyond the scope of this post.
In case you didn’t get the memo, we are currently in a depression.
And given that American citizens can be indefinitely detained or assassinated at the whim of the president, it is pretty clear that we now live in a police state.
This post will demonstrate – without getting into discussions of an “inside job” one way or the other – that the failure to hold a real 9/11 investigation is a core cause of our loss of our prosperity and freedom.
The Failure to Investigate 9/11 Has Bankrupted America
Top economists say that endless war bankrupts a nation.
For example, Nobel prize winning economist Joe Stiglitz says that the $3-5 trillion spent on the Iraq war alone has been very bad for the American economy.
The endless wars have also been a main component of America’s soaring debt:
And huge debts exert a very real drag on the economy.
As shown below, we wouldn’t have launched the war against Iraq – or the endless panoply of wars throughout the Middle East and North America – if 9/11 had actually been in investigated.
(Even the 9/11 Commission itself admits that there was criminal obstruction of justice and a whitewash of the investigation. As such, there has never been a real investigation.)
The Police State Was Caused by the Failure to Investigate 9/11
The police state started in 2001.
Specifically, on 9/11, Vice President Dick Cheney initiated Continuity of Government Plans that ended America’s constitutional form of government (at least for some undetermined period of time.)
On that same day, a national state of emergency was declared … and that state of emergency has continuously been in effect up to today.
It is beyond dispute that 9/11 was entirely foreseeable, but – due to the extreme negligence and incompetence or lack of caring of the Bush administration (remember, I’m not getting into any other theories in this post) it wasn’t stopped. Even the chair of the 9/11 Commission said that the attack was preventable.
If there had been a real 9/11 investigation, the Bush administration’s extreme negligence would have come to light. And Americans would have learned that terrorism can largely be prevented if the military and intelligence officers are simply allowed to do their job.
As just one example, Dick Cheney was in charge of all counter-terrorism exercises, activities and responses on 9/11.
The genius Mr. Cheney apparently scheduled 5 war games for the morning of 9/11. Specifically, on the very morning of September 11th, five war games and terror drills were being conducted by several U.S. defense agencies, purportedly including one “live fly” exercise using real planes. Then-Acting Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General Richard B. Myers, admitted to 4 of the war games in congressional testimony — see transcript here or video here (6 minutes and 12 seconds into the video.
False radar blips to be inserted onto air traffic controllers’ screens as part of the war game exercises, which may have confused the heck out of them (see this December 9, 2001 Toronto Star article; pay-per-view; reprinted here). Way to let that one slip through, Mr. in-charge-of-all-war-games.
The military – under the Vice President’s command that day – didn’t scramble enough fighter jets, and then scrambled jets far over the Atlantic Ocean, in what Senator Mark Dayton called:
The most gross incompetence and dereliction of responsibility and negligence that I’ve ever, under those extreme circumstances, witnessed in the public sector.
And the knucklehead personally watched flight 77 for many miles, but – according to Secretary of Transportation Norm Minetta – stopped it from being shot down before it hit the Pentagon.
Americans would have learned through any real 9/11 investigation that Cheney’s negligence and mucking around in what should have been the generals’ jobs was partly responsible for allowing 9/11 to happen.
In other words, a real 9/11 investigation would have shown Americans that 9/11 should of, could of, and would have been stopped – and that America can protect itself against future terrorist attacks – simply by playing goalie well in our country.
And Americans – instead of being scared into immobility – would have been mad at our government for dropping the ball. And we would have demanded accountability and effective service from our elected officials. (Indeed, experts have repeatedly demonstrated that fear of terror makes people stupid … and makes them willing to accept a loss of liberty and other abuses they would never otherwise accept.)
The Road Not Taken
Instead, of course, Americans were led to believe that Al Qaeda was going to get us unless we took the fight to the Middle East and North Africa. The administration pretended that Saddam Hussein had a hand in 9/11 – one of the main justifications for that war.
Had a real 9/11 investigation been conducted before we launched the Iraq war, it would have taken awayone of the two main rationales for that war. (The FBI was also instructed to blame the anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda, and high-level government officials pointed towards Iraq as the source of the anthrax, even though there was absolutely no basis for those claims. But that’s another story.)
Dan Rather was right when he wrote last week:
We have been so afraid; so hell bent on destroying enemies … both foreign and domestic … we have hurt ourselves and our democracy.
Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser also told the Senate in 2007 that the war on terror is so overblown that it is “a mythical historical narrative”.
And as I noted in 2008:
Former deputy national intelligence officer for transnational threats, a 23-year senior CIA analyst, who “drafted or was involved in many of the government’s most senior assessments of the threats facing our country [and who] devoted years to understanding and combating the jihadist threat”, writes today in the Washington Post that the neocons have whipped us into an irrational fear of the terrorism. In reality, “Osama bin Laden and his disciples are small men and secondary threats whose shadows are made large by our fears” and our leaders.
This is no surprise to anyone who has been paying attention. The BBC produced a documentary called The Power of Nightmares in 2005 that showed that politicians were greatly exaggerating the terrorist threat for political ends.
And unfortunately, many in government have intentionally whipped up fear in the American public for their own political purposes. For example, FBI agents and CIA intelligence officials, constitutional law expert professor Jonathan Turley, Time Magazine, Keith Olbermann and the Washington Post have all said that U.S. government officials “were trying to create an atmosphere of fear in which the American people would give them more power”.
And former Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge admits that he was pressured to raise terror alerts to help Bush win reelection. Fear sells.
And because 9/11 was never really investigated, the government – instead of doing the things which could actually make us safer – are doing things which increase the risk of terrorism.
As such, the threats from terrorism form even more of a “justification” for a suspension of our Constitutional rights.
The failure to investigate 9/11 has bankrupted America financially and morally, and has allowed us to stand idly by while our liberty has been destroyed.
Source: https://www.washingtonsblog.com/
Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton Admitted That The U.S. Created Al Qaeda
Now the United States is trying to eliminate their own created groups by imposing war upon them in their own country for which they have fought for years, and have given them the name “Al Qaeda” which, never existed before the 9/11 incident.
Ron Paul Blames ‘flawed’ US Policies For 9/11
“…in America, you’re supposed to be able to criticize your own government without saying you’re un-American and that’s what the implication is.” - Ron Paul
WASHINGTON (AFP) - US foreign policy is indisputably linked to the September 11 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people a decade ago, Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul said Sunday.
With polls in key states placing him in the top crop of Republican candidates competing to become their party’s nominee to oust Democratic President Barack Obama from the White House, the Texas congressman is facing growing scrutiny over past controversial statements.
Paul, a longtime advocate of less government, reduced taxes and decriminalizing prostitution and drugs, said US intervention abroad was triggering the ire of violent extremists motivated to act because “we don’t like American bombs to be falling on our country.”
“I think there’s an influence,” Paul told CBS television’s “Face the Nation.”
“That’s exactly what the 9/11 Commission said. That’s what the DoD (Department of Defense) has said. That’s also what the CIA has said. That’s what a lot of researchers have said.”
The interview came as a Bloomberg News poll has Paul in a statistical dead heat with three other candidates for the Republican lead in Iowa, a critical state in the nominating process that will host on January 3 the first early vote kicking off the 2012 election cycle.
He pointed to the US military’s withdrawal from a base in Saudi Arabia shortly after 9/11 as an example of how US policies are partially responsible for violent actions against Americans.
And Paul said that if he became president, he would pull US troops out of bases overseas, claiming that defenses like submarines would be powerful enough as deterrents.
But he was quick to take issue with those characterizing his position as meaning the attacks were “America’s fault.”
“The average American didn’t cause it. But if you have a flawed policy, it may influence it… I’m saying policies have an effect but that’s a far cry from blaming America,” he said.
“I mean in America, you’re supposed to be able to criticize your own government without saying you’re un-American and that’s what the implication is.”
Paul’s assertions have previously been met with outrage, including among his fellow Republicans. Political observers have long dismissed him as too far outside the mainstream and too close to Libertarian ideals to have a real chance of becoming the Republican nominee.
At the Republican debates, Paul has often sparred with his party rivals on US foreign policy, parting with them by criticizing waterboarding and advocating outreach to Iran despite its nuclear ambitions.
“I think the greatest danger now is for us to overreact,” Paul said after a report by the UN nuclear watchdog strongly suggested Iran was researching nuclear weapons under cover of civilian activities.
“Iran doesn’t have a bomb. There’s no proof, regardless of this recent report. And for us to overreact and to talk about bombing Iran, that’s much more dangerous.”
Source: https://www.activistpost.com/2011/11/ron-paul-blames-flawed-us-policies-for.html
Six Trillion Dollars
Immediately after the White House broadcasted news the death of Osama, the American peoples immediately took to the streets. feasts to celebrating the joy of a success by destroyed something that during the last teen years that haunts them. However, perhaps many Americans do not know anything about the works that had been done by their own government to arrive at the day of euphoria. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e672/7e6723a2cb610d99607451bc7e18087b2c97a5ec" alt="BUSH - USA CABINET"
The majority of Americans never know, and probably don’t know how many losses suffered by the Americans and the negative effects that makes their nation fallen disarray due to a “Osama Bin Laden”. In the last fifteen years Americans spends more than U.S. $ 9 trillion dollars for the cost of the domestic economy, war, and security that has been triggered by the attacks on 11 September 2001 ( 911 ).
Event 911 was one of the reasons the U.S. government to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, in order to combat “terrorism” and seek weapons of mass destruction, that has not been found till now. Two of these wars (Afghanistan and Iraq) and U.S. was forced to mobilize the 150,000 troops and spend a quarter of the U.S. defense budget. Not only that, the civil liberties of the American peoples should imprisoned because the fears of terrorism, the rising of global oil price caused by war they made and the U.S. national debt.
But the reality is actually about the number of U.S. troops and weapons in the Afghan war not as wow as well compares to the U.S. report on the sophistication of their weaponry. Keep in mind, a small number of U.S. rockets (stinger) went into Afghanistan after 10 years Russian occupation before the withdrawal of Russian warfare Facilities which rarely used in the important battles. It was rarely for anyone to know about these these tools. Some weapons were actually stolen by Pakistani intelligence. They were used to steal some relief funds and goods to the Afghan mujahideen, such as cars, various SAR equipment, logistics, ammunition, and weapons entering through Pakistan come to the Afghan mujahideen.
What was the role of these rockets in destroying more than 50 thousand Russian military equipment, killing more than 30 thousand Russian soldiers in that place, and killed more than 150 thousand Afghan militia of pro-Soviet communists. Even hundreds of thousands of operations for jihadist attacks that had implemented more than 15 years, started 5 years before the Russian invasion for 3 years and then through the capital Kabul in the hands of the mujahideen, namely from 1973 to 1992.
Afghanistan War, Iraq war, and war against the Mujahideen in essence did not bring any advantage for the U.S. This is different from what happened during the war against Joseph Stalin, who at least produce an important technological breakthroughs that revolutionized the U.S. economy. War against Osama at least for the U.S. to provide only one advantage, that is unmanned aircraft. Imagine it ! ! three billion U.S. dollars for unmanned aircraft projects? It seemed it was too excessive.
Linda Bilmes, a lecturer at Harvard University in a book she wrote with Nobel-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, says, “we have spent a large sum of money that has not influented much on strengthening our military, and even it has a very weak impact to our economy”. This is consistent with what is expected from Osama, in a video recording of he says, “we will continue to make Americans reach at the point of collapse”. And it’s really happened.
U.S. Civil Wars
Meanwhile, despite the civil war spent expenditures amounting to 280 billion U.S. dollars, there were many positive impacts that can be learned by the Americans. Among them, the first railway standards grew from coast to coast, carrying goods across the State and textile mills began to migrate from the Northeast to the South looking for cheap labor, including former slaves who had joined the workforce. The fighting itself is accelerating mechanization of American agriculture: Because farmers flocked to the battlefield, the workers left their jobs and adopt new technologies in agriculture. Which also in World War II, the budget issued by the U.S. reached 4.4 trillion U.S. dollars. “It is a national mobilization that has never happened before” said Chris Hellman, defense budget analyst at the National Priorities Project.
While the war that deals with Osama, made the U.S. too much in the acts. Bombings of U.S. embassies in Africa, causing Washington had to spend the funds four times larger than necessary to maintain diplomatic security worldwide in the year and next. And raised the expenditure of 172 billion dollars to 2.2 trillion dollars over the next decades.
Attacks of 11 September 2001 by Intelligence Drama was a disaster that must be paid with high price by the U.S. Economists estimate the losses from 50 billion up to 100 billion dollars. The stock market plummeted and continues to fall to 13 percent a year later.
Then the greater costs incurred by the U.S. to invade Afghanistan in order to reply to attack Al Qaeda. It’s also the U.S. invasion of Iraq that makes 911 event as their own reason related to Islamic extremism and weapons of mass destruction. The second war in top (Afghanistan and Iraq) costed 1.4 trillion dollars, and even the U.S. government is still borrowing hundreds of billions dollars more and increase the U.S. debt interest expensed amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars.
“So… Osama Bin Laden is The Greatest, he is not as bad as Hitler, or Mussolini, etc.” Even Bin Laden produces such great effects. War in Iraq and Afghanistan has created a world which non-war budget also been used.
6 trillion dollars for an Osama
Based all the costs incurred, at least in the war against Osama, U.S. is forced had to spend the funds reach 3 trillion dollars. It was only approximate, because the war in Iraq has the cost more than that calculated. So.. the euphoria party of the death of Osama still needs to be rethought. Michael O’Hanlon, a national security analyst at the Brookings Institution said, “I do not take great of my satisfaction in his death because I’m still amazed at how high the destructions and losses he gave U.S.A”. That is just an Osama, one man. Many who has considered the U.S. to continue the “war on terrorism.” Osama has hundreds or even thousands of peoples who would replace him. But the American economy, domestic issues are increasingly complex, the costs to “help the spread of democracy” in other countries.
Everything takes a long time, and together with it all, America’s debt will rise to 9 trillion U.S. dollars with U.S. debts over the next decade. It means “three-Osama.” Although Osama is claimed to has been buried under the sea, there are extremely many Islamic fighters who are competing his position as a Mujahideen. In the same time, new enemies, both from within and abroad the U.S. has been waiting. So with what Americans would pay for all this?
Source: https://www.thosepeoples.tk/2011/11/six-trillion-dollars.html
George Tenet Faces Indictment For Pre-9/11 Coverup
In recordings released yesterday and earlier in August, Richard Clarke, the former White House Director of Counter-Terrorism alleges that top CIA officials including George Tenet intentionally withheld crucial intelligence from the FBI concerning known Al Qaeda operatives in the US before September 11 which could have possibly prevented the attacks.
This is only the most recent reason to immediately indict Tenet as he is also proven to have lied before the joint congressional inquiry after 9/11 by stating that he did not meet with Ex-President Bush in August of 2001 when CIA records later proved that they met twice; once in Crawford, Texas on August 17th and again in Washington on August 31.
The identities of other officials involved in the coverup include Alfreda Frances Bikowsky, the current Director of the CIA Global Jihad Unit, CTC Director J. Cofer Black and Richard Blee of Alec Station.
Holding a top U.S.A. intelligence position does not give anyone the right to purger themselves in congressional hearings. These actions classify as obstruction of justice and need to be brought to national attention and courts immediately.
Sources:
CSPAN | George Tenet Lied Before The 9/11 Commission | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BF_Y4oRsDqE
https://secrecykills.com
https://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2011/09/21/bfp-breaking-news-confirmed-identity-of-the-cia-official-behind-911-rendition-torture-cases-is-revealed/