January 21, 2013

Fracking Hell: The Untold Story

 

An original investigative report by Earth Focus and UK’s Ecologist Film Unit looks at the risks of natural gas development in the Marcellus Shale. From toxic chemicals in drinking water to unregulated interstate dumping of potentially radioactive waste that experts fear can contaminate water supplies in major population centers including New York City, are the health consequences worth the economic gains?

Marcellus Shale contains enough natural gas to supply all US gas needs for 14 years. But as gas drilling takes place, using a process called hydraulic fracturing or “fracking,” toxic chemicals and methane gas seep into drinking water. Now experts fear that unacceptable levels of radioactive Radium 226 in gas development waste.

Fracking chemicals are linked to bone, liver and breast cancers, gastrointestinal, circulatory, respiratory, developmental as well as brain and nervous system disorders. Such chemicals are present in frack waste and may find their way into drinking water and air.

Waste from Pennsylvania gas wells — waste that may also contain unacceptable levels of radium — is routinely dumped across state lines into landfills in New York, Ohio and West Virginia. New York does not require testing waste for radioactivity prior to dumping or treatment. So drill cuttings from Pennsylvania have been dumped in New York’s Chemung and other counties and liquid waste is shipped to treatment plants in Auburn and Watertown New York. How radioactive is this waste? Experts are calling are for testing to find out.

New York State may have been the first state in the nation to put a temporary hold on fracking pending a safety review, but it allows other states to dump toxic frack waste within its boundaries.

With a gas production boom underway in the Marcellus Shale and plans for some 400,000 wells in the coming decades, the cumulative impact of dumping potential lethal waste without adequate oversight is a catastrophe waiting to happen. And now U.S. companies are exporting fracking to Europe.

Gasland Part 1 of 2

Land Council Calls For Fracking Halt

BY NIGEL ADLAM

(AUSTRALIA) THE Central Land Council has called for a freeze on fracking, the technique used to extract oil and gas from layers of shale underground.

Council director David Ross said the halt on permit applications should last until environmental assessments had been carried out and strict regulations drawn up.

He said the potential impact of fracking - where water and sand are blasted down a well to force shale apart - was “enormous“.

 

Source: http://www.ntnews.com.au/article/2011/12/13/278075_ntnews.html

EPA Links Wyoming Water Pollution to Fracking

In a new report released on December 8, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the first time officially blamed water contamination on a natural gas drilling method known as hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking.” The process involves pumping a slurry of sand, water, and chemicals deep into the ground to crack the bedrock and release pockets of methane, which is how EPA says the drilling company EnCana contaminated groundwater outside Pavillion, Wyoming.

Fracking Chemicals Found in Drinking Wells

EPA first found contaminates in drinking water wells around Pavillion in 2008. After a second round of testing in 2010 and some isolated methane explosions, EPA warned residents not to drink their water and to ventilate their homes when bathing and showering. In the latest round of tests EPA, found at least 10 compounds known to be used in fracking fluids in deep test wells.

EnCana claims the contamination is caused naturally, but EPA concluded that both drilling and leaking pools of drilling waste to be the cause:

“…the EPA said that pollution from 33 abandoned oil and gas waste pits – which are the subject of a separate cleanup program – are indeed responsible for some degree of shallow groundwater pollution in the area. Those pits may be the source of contamination affecting at least 42 private water wells in Pavillion. But the pits could not be blamed for contamination detected in the water monitoring wells 1,000 feet underground.

“That contamination, the agency concluded, had to have been caused by fracking,” reported Propublica.

EPA Analysis Verses Industry Rhetoric on Fracking Safety

The report debunks many arguments by drilling companies about the safety of hydraulic fracturing, including:

that fracking pressure forces drilling fluids down only, not up;
• that no chemicals can migrate toward the surface because the geologic layers are watertight;
• that fracking did not cause the problems with cement and steel barriers on gas wells that may have allowed methane to escape into residential wells, creating an explosion risk.

EPA Report the Smoking Gun on Fracking Safety?

While this report may and probably should cause regulators in New York State and Appalachia to look hard at industry claims of safety, EPA did not go so far as to conclude that fracking in other parts of the United States had caused or could cause similar contamination. EPA only extended their conclusions to the unique hydrology and geology in the area surrounding Pavillion, Wyoming.

 

Source: http://www.care2.com/causes/epa-links-wyoming-water-pollution-to-fracking.html#ixzz1gKJbZYjs