January 20, 2013

Touching Video of Laboratory Beagles Released for First Time

Millions of dogs each year are used as test subjects in order to study the effects of harmful pharmaceuticals, toxic household cleaners, and chemical-laden cosmetic products. A group known as Animal Rescue Media Education is dedicated to not only attempt to rescue science-lab dogs, but they also try and find them a home. In one of their largest rescue missions, the organization successfully rescued 72 beagles. With 32 already adopted by the time the press started picking up the story, the remaining 30 dogs were being nursed back to health.

In this touching video, watch as 9 rescued beagles are released from their cages for the first time. This is not only the first time they’ve seen sunlight, but the first time the animals are walking on solid ground.

“We’ve been told they lived one per cage in rooms of 10 beagles, but they never had any physical interaction with one another,” Smith said. “They’ve been in kennels since they were rescued about a week ago, but aside from that, they’ve spent most of their lives locked up.”

It is very easy to disregard animal testing as a real issue just as it is very simple to ignore international slave labor — it oftentimes simply does not affect you until you see it first hand. When you read product labels stating that the item was not tested on animals, it may mean very little to you.

Videos like these provide a wake-up call to the very cruel reality of animal testing and other forms of animal abuse.

It is important to consider how many other important issues are also disregarded due to the lack of immediate effect — particularly when it comes to your health. Perhaps the high-fructose corn syrup in your diet may not immediately harm you, but it may lead to disease later down the road.

If you are interested in adopting one of the dogs or supporting the organization responsible for rescuing the beagles, you can view their adoption page.

 

Help Schapelle Corby: She Has Endured Years Of Cruelty, Suffering & Is Dying In The Squalor Of An Indonesian Prison Cell

Schapelle Corby is an innocent Australian woman, who has endured years of cruelty and suffering in the squalor of an Indonesian prison cell. She was sentenced to a political 20 YEARS for importing a few pounds of marijuana, which to her horror she discovered in her bag on arrival. There followed the most shocking injustice and human rights abuses.

Incredibly, she has been deserted by her government for political expediency, who have used the media to subdue public opinion. Having had her soul finally broken, she is now confirmed mentally ill… literally dying in a squalid filthy overcrowded cell.

Yet appallingly she is still there, with the government doing nothing to help her. She needs YOUR help.

PLEASE SIGN & SHARE THE PETITION [Click on Link: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/People-For-Schapelle-Corby/]

URGENT: SCHAPELLE’S FAILING HEALTH

One of Australia’s top psychiatrists recently got access to Schapelle for a full examination. His report was devastating. For a young woman to be reduced to the shocking state she in is an affront to civilization. She is hanging on by a thread. Unless action is taken soon, she will die on the filthy rat infested floor of her cell, and return home in a box.

The inaction of the Australian government beggars belief. A mentally ill citizen is dying in a hell hole, and they hide behind protocol, presumably because there is no political cost to the death of a normal working class girl.

WE have to create that cost.

We have to tell the world about this.

We have to explain to Australians how the truth they saw some of in 2004/5 has been distorted and hidden.

We have to tell the two governmets that we the PEOPLE won’t walk away.

But we have to do it NOW. Please join us…… a life literally depends upon it.

Source: http://schapellecorby.org/

Internet Freedom In Central Asia Worsens Say Human Rights Groups

Internet freedom in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan is amongst the worst in the world and, although not nearly as bad, it is deteriorating rapidly in Kazakhstan, a group of human rights organisations have said.

The three Central Asian states have justified increasing censorship of the internet as necessary to combat the growing threat from Islamic militants who are using email and websites to find recruits and pass around information.

But this is just an excuse and the real reasons are more sinister, said a report written by the human rights groups.

“In reality this fight is used as a pretext for implementing measures to stifle free speech and help preserve the governments’ grip on power,” the report said.

In Kazakhstan the authorities sporadically cut off blogging platforms which they say host extremist sites, in Turkmenistan access to the internet is strictly controlled and reaches only about 2.2 percent of the population and in Uzbekistan the government has set up a social networking site through which it can monitor users and draw them away from Facebook, which is seen as a threat.

The Hague-based Netherlands Helsinki Committee, the Brussels-based International Partnership for Human Rights and locally focused organisations in all three countries wrote the report, released this week.

They said the international community should act fast.

“We appeal to the EU, as well as to other international actors to help put pressure on the governments of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan to end excessive censorship and control of the internet,” the report said.

But other human rights groups have complained recently that Western powers have become more and more reluctant to apply pressure on Central Asian states which are seen increasingly as business partners and diplomatic allies.

The United States considers Uzbekistan to be a vital cog in its supply route to forces fighting in Afghanistan, the European Union is competing with other countries to buy gas from Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan has emerged as the region’s biggest economy with plenty of business opportunities.

All three governments, to varying degrees, are considered authoritarian. The report did not cover Kyrgyzstan or Tajikistan, the two smaller Central Asian countries.

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/kazakhstan/8925268/Internet-freedom-in-Central-Asia-worsens-say-human-rights-groups.html

US Internet Freedom Hypocrisy

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton calls on a world which respects Internet freedom as the US Justice Department targets WikiLeaks and Julian Assange.

The Justice Department is pressing the court to require Twitter to turn over private information about the use of its services by three WikiLeaks supporters.

The US champions a free flow of information, free speech and a free Internet, until it is no longer in their favor.

America calls for a respect for the rights of others, their privacy and free expression, but goes after US citizen’s cell phones, computer activity and other personal data.

Our commitment to Internet freedom is a commitment ot the rights of people, and we are matching that with our actions,” Clinton stated in a her speech.

Former Reagan administration official Paul Craig Roberts said the US government is a blatant public hypocrite and has been for a long time.

It’s [US government] always lecturing everybody else, but it never follows its own advice,” Roberts said.

He argued the US has actively trampled on the civil liberties of its own people under the auspice of the War on Terror, yet at the same time the government lectures others on responsibilities to protect freedoms.

We are really the worst offender,” he added. “This should show the world what a hypocrite the United States is!”

Roberts said, as an American, he is embarrassed by the blatant hypocrisy his government represents.

On one had the US has worked to support Twitter and Facebook use in Egypt, and now Iran having lunched Twitter sites in local languages.

America likes to use technology to undermine others. But as soon as the tables turn they flip their stance, such as the case of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange and Pfc. Bradley Manning.

He argued the US wants to terrify the rising new breed of Internet journalism, using fear to shut them up.

Bradley Manning’s civil rights are being blatantly violated by the United States government, Roberts said. “Yet nothing is done about it.”

Source: http://rt.com/usa/news/usa-internet-freedom-hypocrisy/

Whale Activists Sue To Free Lolita From Captivity

Supporters have offered $1 million for her release. Annual demonstrations have demanded her return to the Northwest. Over the years, celebrities, schoolchildren and even a Washington state governor have campaigned to free Lolita, a killer whale captured from Puget Sound waters in 1970 and who has been performing at Miami Seaquarium for the past four decades.

Activists are now suing the federal government in federal court in Seattle, saying it should have protected Lolita when it listed other Southern Resident orcas as an endangered species in 2005.

“The fact that the federal government has declared these pods to be endangered is a good thing, but they neglected to include these captives,” said Karen Munro, a plaintiff in the lawsuit who lives in Olympia, Wash. Plaintiffs include two other individuals, the Animal Legal Defense Fund and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

The lawsuit filed in November alleges that the fisheries service allows the Miami Seaquarium to keep Lolita in conditions that harm and harass her and otherwise wouldn’t be allowed under the Endangered Species Act. The lawsuit alleges Lolita is confined in an inadequate tank without sufficient space and without companions of her own species.

The agency is still reviewing the lawsuit, said Monica Allen, a spokeswoman with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, whose fisheries service oversees marine mammals.

Lolita, who is estimated to be about 44 or 45, is the last surviving orca captured from the Southern Resident orca population during the 1970s. She is a member of the L pod, or family. Female orcas generally live into their 50s though they can live decades longer.

Wallie Funk / AP

In this Aug. 8, 1970, photo provided by Wallie Funk, members of a pod of orca whales are held captive in Penn Cove, off Whidbey Island, Wash. Seven of the dozens of whales captured, including Lolita, who has been performing stunts for Miami Seaquarium for the past four decades, were sold to marine parks around the world. Five whales drowned during the capture.

The J, K and L pods frequent Western Washington’s inland marine waters and are genetically and behaviorally distinct from other killer whales. They eat salmon rather than marine mammals, show an attachment to the region, and make sounds that are considered a unique dialect. The whales, with striking black coloring and white bellies, spend time in tight, social groups and ply the waters of Puget Sound and British Columbia.

When the National Marine Fisheries Service listed the Southern Resident orcas as endangered — in decline because of lack of prey, pollution and contaminants, and effects from vessels and other factors — it didn’t include whales placed in captivity prior to the listing or their captive born offspring.

They’re “not maximizing opportunity to protect the species if you exclude captive members,” said Craig Dillard, litigation director for the Animal Legal Defense. Lolita should have the same protections as other wild orcas, he added.

He noted that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is currently considering whether to give all captive chimpanzees the same protection as wild chimpanzees.

‘She remembers’


The Miami Seaquarium declined to comment on the lawsuit. It issued a statement saying Lolita is active, healthy, well-cared for and plays an important role in educating the public about the need to conserve the species. Lolita has learned to trust humans completely, the statement says, and “this longstanding behavioral trust would be dangerous for her if she were returned to Puget Sound, where commercial boat traffic and human activity are heavy, pollution is a serious issue and the killer whale population has been listed as an endangered species.”

Howard Garrett, co-founder of the nonprofit Orca Network based on Whidbey Island, Wash., said returning her to Northwest waters is the right thing to do. It would be healthier for her, and allow her to rebuild family bonds with the L pod.

“She remembers where she came from. I think she will remember her water and her family,” said Garrett, who has spent years advocating for her release and whose group plans to help Lolita transition back to Northwest waters.

Munro joined the lawsuit because she believes Lolita deserves to retire and return to the Puget Sound, where she can swim naturally and attempt to reunite with her family.

She became an advocate for the majestic creatures, after witnessing a “very violent, distressing scene” of orcas being torn from their pods while out sailing in 1976. The captors used explosives, boats and seaplanes to chase the animals into shallower waters and netted them, she said.

“They were taking these orcas away purely for money and profit, because they make huge amounts of money from whale shows. They (orcas) don’t belong in these aquariums,” she said, adding “Lolita deserves to come back.”

 

Source: http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/02/9169352-whale-activists-sue-to-free-lolita-from-captivity